ECCTA’s failure-to-prevent fraud offence is now a year old. Would your TPRM programme survive a board-level stress test?
One year since the UK’s Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act reshaped corporate liability, boards are asking sharper questions about third-party risk oversight — and “failure to prevent” obligations mean organisations can no longer treat TPRM as a back-office function.
📅 Thursday 17th September, 4PM BST / 10AM CST
⏱️ 30 minutes sharp
🎙️ Highly conversational, practical insights and takeaways
In this next episode, host Jan Stappers, EVP, GRC Solutions Strategy sits down with Maria Cronin, Business Crime Partner at Peters & Peters, to unpack what ECCTA has really changed for TPRM and whether your programme would hold up under board (or regulator) scrutiny.
A year on from ECCTA, reasonable procedures are no longer a theoretical defence, it’s an expectation. Jan and Maria will cut through the noise on:
-
What board-ready TPRM actually looks like under ECCTA’s failure-to-prevent fraud offence
-
Where third-party due diligence gaps create the biggest corporate liability exposure
-
How to move from reactive risk-spotting to demonstrable, defensible oversight
Don’t miss this episode of the straight-talking global GERC series.
