How to Build Third-Party Risk Metrics
As organizations become increasingly interconnected, granting third parties access to data and systems becomes not just beneficial, but necessary. This, however, can open the door to third-party vulnerabilities and incidents like data breaches and supply chain attacks, with the potential for severe consequences. Boards of directors and business leaders are thus demanding more visibility into their organizations’ vast third-party ecosystems.
To mitigate the impact of these risks, it is crucial to understand this multifaceted ecosystem and its moving parts: the people involved, processes, and technologies. Third-party risk management (TPRM) can help you tackle these challenges. When implemented correctly, a TPRM program can enable you to identify and mitigate risks before they negatively impact your organization.
TPRM Reporting: A Complex Task
While TPRM reporting is critical for identifying and prioritizing risks, it can be a complex endeavor for nascent and experienced teams alike. Even identifying a starting point can be a complicated task. As a result, many teams struggle to effectively communicate third-party risks – and some still rely on outdated, overly technical, and complex methods and dashboards. It’s no surprise that the topic of third-party risk often spurs confusion between the board, executive leadership and functional teams.
It’s therefore crucial to identify, formulate and implement the appropriate TPRM metrics for your organization. Addressing the challenges associated with identifying and mitigating third-party risks also calls for thorough planning and a comprehensive understanding of the correlation between metrics and business objectives.
To address these concerns, this post will:
- Explain what TPRM metrics are and why they’re essential
- Guide you through the process of developing and implementing the right TPRM metrics across different stages of the third-party vendor risk management lifecycle
- Share best practices and critical factors to consider when formulating TPRM metrics
TPRM Metrics and Their Significance
Before deciding which metrics to set up, we need to delve into what TPRM metrics are, their importance, and what types of metrics categories you should be aware of.
TPRM metrics are indicators that assist an organization in gauging the progress of its TPRM strategy and program. When executed correctly, these metrics reassure the organization’s leadership, board of directors and auditors that the third parties they work with pose an acceptable level of risk. If these third parties are associated with unacceptable risks, then having the right metrics will simplify the remediation and mitigation processes.
It is therefore important for an organization to have meaningful metrics that consist of a consolidated set of key risk indicators (KRIs) and key performance indicators (KPIs). These will aid in reducing the analysis of large, complex security dashboards and enable teams to filter the relevant data they need to identify and remediate risks.
Identifying, formulating and tracking the right TPRM metrics are crucial tasks for the following reasons:
Risk Identification and Assessment
It’s vital for teams to be able to discern and assess various levels of risk across the entire third-party vendor lifecycle. Unique metrics for onboarding, management and offboarding will reveal relevant risks for teams to proactively address at each stage.
Compliance and Regulatory Requirements
With approximately 160 different global legislations and frameworks such as ISO, CCPA, GDPR, PCI and NIST – each with its own requirements for managing third-party risk – it’s essential for organizations to appropriately govern third parties and meet compliance requirements.
Vendor Performance Management
Many organizations lack a simple way to manage service level agreements (SLAs) with their vendors, increasing the likelihood of risks being introduced into the ecosystem. Implementing tools, metrics and programs that facilitate continuous monitoring of contractual provisions will enable you to ensure that SLAs are met.
Financial Considerations
The introduction of TPRM metrics is also crucial to an organization’s vendor selection, contract negotiation and termination processes. These metrics enable teams to plan, monitor, identify and mitigate any detected risks.
Board and Stakeholder Reporting
With the right metrics, teams can regularly update the organization’s board of directors, management and auditors, enabling them to make informed decisions about any potential risks that arise.
Continuous TPRM Program Improvement
Measuring the right TPRM metrics not only enables teams to identify and mitigate potential risks, but also assists various departments in coordinating third-party risk assessments and in onboarding, managing and offboarding third-party vendors.
Developing TPRM Metrics
Having examined the significance of TPRM metrics, let’s delve into the process of developing effective TPRM metrics for teams to use. Figure 1 below illustrates the process:
Figure 1: The TPRM Metrics Development Process
People: Appointing Leadership
The organization’s CEO and board of directors will often direct the chief risk officer (CRO) to orchestrate and harmonize the process through an Enterprise Risk Council (ERC), a working group that consists of members from different business units. In the case of smaller organizations without a CRO, the ERC could consist of the chief information security officer (CISO) or the head of IT, the head of procurement, and the chief financial officer (CFO). The objective is to facilitate cross-departmental collaboration, regardless of the company’s size.
Process: Defining Who and What to Measure
Step 1: Set Enterprise Objectives
With the ERC in place, the enterprise objectives for TPRM are then determined. The ERC begins by asking strategic questions, including:
- What are our objectives? What are we aiming to accomplish?
- Do we have any metrics in mind?
- Which regulations apply to us?
- Why is the business investing in this program?
- How can we demonstrate successful implementation of TPRM at scale?
- How do we track risk reduction success in the program over time?
Upon addressing these questions, the ERC then develops the enterprise objectives for TPRM, potentially utilizing a solution offered by a TPRM vendor. These may include:
- Protecting the organization’s and customers’ sensitive data and intellectual property
- Ensuring legal and regulatory compliance of vendors and suppliers
- Implementing measures to decrease cybersecurity risks
- Implementing measures to mitigate operational and financial risks
- Safeguarding the organization’s reputation
- Enhancing the organization’s operational efficiency
- Ensuring business resilience with a clear action plan, and ensuring team members understand their roles and responsibilities
- Implementing a TPRM program that supports informed decision-making
TPRM Metrics Categories: An Overview
Before proceeding to set specific departmental objectives, it’s important to have a clear understanding of the different categories of TPRM metrics
that can be considered.
It’s also essential at this point to understand the difference between KPIs and KRIs, as both are equally important to TPRM metrics.
- Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) measure the effectiveness of organizational processes and functions
- Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)
measure the level of risk the organization faces and how effectively it’s being managed
As part of a robust third-party risk management strategy, your organization should focus on four primary areas of measurement. Each area consists of KPIs and KRIs that provide invaluable insights into your relationship with suppliers.
- Risk Metrics
These metrics help in assessing the risks associated with specific suppliers. They provide insights into potential threats, corresponding mitigation strategies, and the supplier’s adherence to both primary and remunerative controls.
- Threat Metrics
These metrics consist of publicly available data relating to cyber, operational, financial and reputational aspects. They help to address how vendor risk data correlates with externally observable threats.
- Compliance Metrics
These metrics reveal how well suppliers’ practices comply with your organization’s internal control environment. They also measure adherence to regulatory requirements and frameworks, which is critical for maintaining legal and industry standards.
- Coverage Metrics
These metrics are designed to ensure that your organization has a complete understanding of its global supplier footprint. They help identify the third, fourth and Nth parties in your supply chain and verify whether they have been classified appropriately in your program.
The first two categories, Risk and Threat Metrics, largely consist of KPI and KRI metrics related to risk factors and external influences. The latter two categories, Compliance and Coverage metrics, are geared more toward internal program evaluation and alignment. These four categories together provide a comprehensive and balanced approach to third-party risk management.
Now that we have an understanding of the different categories of TPRM metrics, we can proceed to establish objectives at the departmental level.
Step 2: Set Departmental Objectives
During this phase, the CEO could meet with the departmental heads and invite them to the ERC. In smaller organizations, the CEO might meet with the CISO or the head of IT, head of procurement and the CFO. The departmental heads then define the departmental objectives for TPRM drawing from ERC recommendations.
Here are some of the questions they would consider:
- Which third-party interactions are involved in our department’s operations?
- What sensitive data and systems in our department can third parties access?
- Which regulations govern our department (e.g., GDPR)?
Once this is completed, departmental teams are formed, led by the departmental heads. These teams will have several responsibilities that are highlighted in the following steps.
Step 3: Identify Third Parties
The departmental teams begin by identifying third parties such as vendors, suppliers, contractors, logistics partners, cloud service providers, or others. At this stage, teams might work with procurement, accounts payable or other internal teams that maintain a working list of vendors and suppliers to centralize those third parties for better governance.
Step 4: Identify Risks to Measure
After the third parties have been identified, the teams determine potential risks associated with each party. These risks might include data breaches, reputational concerns, regulatory fines, financial solvency concerns, and supply chain disruptions.
[Callout box]:
Recommendation: Your organization might be confronted with several supplier risks that you were previously not aware of. Find out what these different types of risks are and how to mitigate them by reading the blog: Top Supplier Risks and What to Do About Them |
Step 5: Identify Performance Indicators
Upon identifying third parties and potential risks, the teams create and establish performance indicators for regular monitoring.
The following section offers some insights into what defines a good metric for TPRM.
- Data Availability/Quality: This ensures that data is available for reporting and that teams can access a centralized repository of holistic vendor risk profiles.
- Standardization/Consistency: Harmonizing processes and views across business units regarding potential vendor risks can streamline operations.
- Data Integration across Multiple Systems: This refers to the consolidation and integration of platforms to provide a unified view of vendor risk across the organization.
- Simplicity of Analysis:
Automating programmatic processes can help manage the large volume of data that needs to be analyzed.
- Interpretation and Contextualization: This involves understanding the audience and context to provide clear, succinct and meaningful information.
- Report Formatting and Communication: The ability to distill, communicate and present data in a user-friendly format is crucial.
- Timeliness and Frequency: The capacity to continuously monitor vendors and understand risk developments in real time is paramount in any effective TPRM program.
Teams can also seek support and recommendations from your TPRM vendor at this stage. Experienced vendors typically offer libraries containing relevant content, playbooks and other information to aid in identifying pertinent risks, tracking performance indicators, building reporting strategies, and addressing other concerns.
[Callout box]:
Use these tips to avoid common pitfalls when setting up TPRM metrics:
|
Step 6: Harmonize Metrics Across the TPRM Lifecycle
In this step, the ERC collaborates with department heads and establishes working groups to align all the identified risks and performance indicators. The groups then work to standardize and synchronize metrics across each stage of the Third-Party Vendor Risk Management Lifecycle.
The following chart highlights select metrics that should be considered at each stage along with the department that would typically be involved:
Third-Party Risk Lifecycle Stage |
Select TPRM Metrics |
Relevant to These Cross-Functional Teams |
1. Sourcing & Selection |
|
|
2. Intake & Onboarding |
|
|
3. Score Inherent Risk |
|
|
4. Assess & Remediate |
|
|
5. Monitor & Validate |
|
|
6. Manage Ongoing Performance |
|
|
7. Terminate & Offboard |
|
|
[Callout box]:
Recommendation: To find out more about how to identify the right TPRM metrics, read the eBook “The 25 Most Important KPIs and KRIs for Third-Party Risk Management” and download the scorecard. |
The Prevalent TPRM Solution
Whether you are starting a new TPRM program or want to optimize your existing TPRM metrics initiatives, Prevalent can provide the solutions, services and support you need.
The Prevalent Third-Party Risk Management Platform is a SaaS solution that can enable your entire organization to collaborate on identifying, understanding and reducing vendor risk. With the Prevalent platform, you can:
- Build a centralized database of vendor and supplier risk profiles, including mapping 4th and Nth-party relationships
- Automate the third-party risk assessment process with a library of over 200 standardized questionnaires
- Continuously monitor for new and emerging cyber, financial, operational and reputational risks
- Manage and track the remediation process with automated workflow and playbook capabilities
- Share contextual reports of key metrics with stakeholders throughout the organization
This is backed by our experienced professional services (PS) team, who can help you further streamline the process by:
- Helping to identify pertinent KPI and KRI metrics across the vendor lifecycle
- Establishing threshold expectations and initiating timely alerts
- Supporting you throughout the remediation process, as well as tracking resolution procedures
- Providing access to a comprehensive library of TPRM content, specifically around custom reporting, TPRM programs, and related performance criteria
- Working with you to develop custom reports tailored to various stakeholders
- Supplying your teams with essential support and documentation based on various persona-based status workflows
To get started with measuring key metrics, download the eBook and scorecard, The 25 Most Important KPIs and KRIs for Third-Party Risk Management. Then, schedule a demo to learn how Prevalent can help you automate and accelerate your TPRM metrics program.
About Prevalent
Prevalent takes the pain out of third-party risk management (TPRM). Companies use our software and services to eliminate the security and compliance exposures that come from working with vendors and suppliers throughout the third-party lifecycle. Our customers benefit from a flexible, hybrid approach to TPRM, where they not only gain solutions tailored to their needs but also realize a rapid return on investment. Regardless of where they start, we help our customers stop the pain, make informed decisions, and adapt and mature their TPRM programs over time.
To learn more, please visit www.prevalent.net
[CB1]We used a similar phrase above, but in a different context. I eliminated it here, since it’s not really necessary.
[CB2]This line could be seen as contradicting the following line, so I eliminated it.
Editor’s Note: This post was originally published on Prevalent.net. In October 2024, Mitratech acquired the AI-enabled third-party risk management, Prevalent. The content has since been updated to include information aligned with our product offerings, regulatory changes, and compliance.